Showing posts with label Kansas City. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kansas City. Show all posts

1.28.2011

Kay Ryan, the Peeving of Poets, and the Incredible Hidden Sedgwick Hall

Last night, I drove out to Rockhurst University to see former Poet Laureate Kay Ryan read as part of the Midwest Poets Series. Typically, driving to the heart of the Plaza to see a poetry reading on a Thursday night isn't my idea of a good time,  but Kay Ryan is a self-avowed introvert-curmudgeon. She makes a lot of fuss about not being a part of the poetry community, enough so that I thought that this event might be my only opportunity to see her read. 

Kay Ryan

So I went, giddy and tired and easily disoriented as I was from my long work week. I had a very hard time finding Sedgwick Hall (mostly because I didn't realize that Rockhurst is just a tiny, unmarked, nearly invisible wart on the buttocks of  the UMKC campus). I drove around for twenty minutes, walked around for another twenty, and asked four different people before I finally stumbled across the building completely by chance!

I was very late, but I decided that half a Kay Ryan reading was better than no Kay Ryan reading at all. And I was right. Despite her hermetic self-image, Ryan was actually very well-spoken and funny, and she charmed the audience with ease. She had the funny habit of reading her poems aloud twice, which was great, actually. 

Ryan's poems are all small--clever, compact little things that work very hard to say something very smart in as little space as possible. Her poems are elegant and deep and often funny, and they really beg for two or three re-readings--despite their size and apparent accessibility, they require thought and patience.

Here are two of my favorites from the reading. I especially liked what Ryan said about "Leaving Spaces"--she believes that people are uncomfortable with emptiness and quiet in life--and I've always loved the humor, fantasticality, and burning truthfulness of "He Lit a Fire with Icicles".

----------


By Kay Ryan

It takes a courageous
person to leave spaces
empty. Certainly any
artist in the Middle Ages
felt this timor, and quickly
covered space over
with griffins, sea serpents,
herbs and brilliant carpets
of flowers – things pleasant
or unpleasant, no matter.
Of course they were cowards
and patronized by cowards
who liked their swards as
filled with birds as leaves.
All of them believed in
sudden edges and completely
barren patches in the mind,
and they didn’t want to
think about them all the time. 

----------

He Lit a Fire with Icicles

by Kay Ryan 


For W.G. Sebald, 1944-2001
This was the work
of St. Sebolt, one
of his miracles:
he lit a fire with
icicles. He struck
them like a steel
to flint, did St.
Sebolt. It
makes sense
only at a certain
body heat. How
cold he had
to get to learn
that ice would
burn. How cold
he had to stay.
When he could
feel his feet
he had to
back away

----------

Despite how much I like Ryan, I did manage to rub her the wrong way when she signed my book after the reading. I asked her if she read a lot of Marianne Moore. In response, Ryan scowled at me. "Well," she said, "I read her long after she could have affected me. I read her when I was young. She bugged the hell out of me." She paused, squinted her eyes up at me, black fountain pen poised over my copy of The Niagara River. "You know, the problem with being a female poet is that you get compared to other female poets all the time." Another squint, a little scowl. "You know?"

"Uh, yeah," I said. "I suppose. Thanks again--it was a lovely reading!" I said, backing away from the table, trying not to giggle. I had peeved a poet! A poet laureate, in fact! (It seemed like some dubious sort of accomplishment.)

I was thinking, It's not like I compared you to Sylvia Plath or Anne Sexton or Rita Dove, lady! It's a question that makes good sense to me. I was thinking about "To a Snail," one of my favorite poems by Marianne Moore. If ever a poet made a virtue of contractility, it is Kay Ryan, whether she likes to think so about herself or not.

----------

To A Snail

 
If “compression is the first grace of style”,
you have it.  Contractility is a virtue
as modesty is a virtue.
It is not the acquisition of any one thing
that is able to adorn,
or the incidental quality that occurs
as a concomitant of something well said,
that we value in style,
but the principle that is hid:
in the absence of feet, “a method of conclusions”;
“a knowledge of principles”,
in the curious phenomenon of your occipital horn.

Marianne Moore


8.04.2009

Headlines: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly Truth

I've always been a big fan of The Kansas City Star, which I think of as my hometown newspaper and read regularly whenever I'm in KC. Here's a round-up of my favorite headlines from the past few days.

------------
Sunday, Matt Campbell reported that Kansas City is turning a portion of its biosolids (read: human poo) into fertilizer for trees and biofuel crops. According to Campbell's article, the city is currently turning 8,000 pounds of dry biosolids into fertilizer each year and plans on expanding the program in the future. The system helps the city save money by reducing the amount of waste the Water Department has to burn, by providing cheaper saplings for planting in public parks, and by contributing income to the city budget in the form of biofuel sales.

Not only is this process amazing, but it's especially impressive in Kansas City, a place that has, until recently, never seemed particularly interested in going green. But then again, large-scale composting has come to KC, so maybe we're not as environmentally backwards as we Midwesterners sometimes seem to be.

------------
More bad news: Today, Emily Van Zandt and Chad Day (who, ironically, are recent college grads employed as summer interns at the Star) revealed that college grads may have diplomas, but they're still missing their paychecks. Van Zandt and Day profile four local college graduates who can't find work, despite their degrees in civil engineering, music education, communications, and Latin American studies.

It's a good article, but not a terribly surprising one since I'm also struggling to find my first post-graduation job. This piece did make me wonder, though, why such articles get published and read at all. Each new issue of every paper in the country is running articles about the state of the economy and how high the unemployment rate has soared, yet nothing visibly changes day to day; there's nothing new to make this "news" exigent. So why are newspapers giving this space, and why do I find myself reading these pieces again and again?

Well, to be honest, they help me feel a little better when I don't get called back for an interview. So there.

------------
Mary McNamara's piece on the shrewish business woman type in American comedies first appeared in The Los Angeles Times but was reprinted in today's Star. McNamara uses Katherine Heigl's role in The Ugly Truth as an example of how most comedic movies depict independent women: as high-strung, neurotic, cold, and bitchy, at least until the manly co-star proves the woman vulnerable and persuades her into leave her career for love. McNamara argues that actresses like Heigl (and Reese Witherspoon and Jennifer Aniston) should avoid these Taming of the Shrew-style roles in movies and stick to the richer, more realistic, and less misogynistic roles found on television shows like In Treatment or The Closer.

While I don't watch enough TV to know whether or not I share McNamara's preference for women on the small screen, I do know that she's dead-on when it comes to romcoms like The Devil Wears Prada. Plots like these are why I want to hurl a copy of A Room of One's Own at my TV screen every time a Jennifer Aniston movie comes on late-night cable.

8.02.2009

Power & Light


Last night, I made my first trip to Kansas City's Power and Light District. It was . . . strange. I'm not sure what else to say, except that I don't think I would go back again if I had the choice.

Power and Light was developed by Baltimore's Cordish company, a real estate and entertainment development firm. The heart of the District is basically a huge cement courtyard punctuated by beer kiosks and surrounded on three sides by a two-story building. The winged building houses multiple bars on its two levels, and its upper story supports a wide suspended sidewalk and a catwalk that connects the two wings together. The courtyard (known as Kansas City Live!) serves as a dance floor and is covered by a suspended roof raised maybe four stories high. The fourth side of the courtyard is closed by a stage area with a giant TV that continually broadcasts advertisements for KCP&L and the District bars.

It's a strange place, brand new and brightly lit and full of enthusiastic partiers dressed in their club finest, but it's also intensely manufactured. C., my boyfriend, described the District as a sort of alcoholic shopping mall. Each bar is themed: there's McFadden's, the Irish pub; Angel's Rock Bar, a music venue decorated in Avril Lavigne-style black and pink; Vinino's, an Italian restaurant and wine bar; etc. Each bar makes a few cheap decorative gestures in neon, pre-fab wall decor, seating arrangements, and lighting in the hope that this will be enough to substitute for something so elusive as character. As I peered into each bar, however, I got the impression that the distinction between each place was as murky the distinction between the Gap, Abercrombie & Fitch, Hollister, and American Eagle.

For me, P&L felt forced, inauthentic, and surreal, yet the courtyard was packed with dancers. The crowd was mixed: there were Boomers and twenty-somethings, white folks and black (and Hispanic and Asian), herds of bachelorette parties and pairs of bachelors, couples and singles, the painfully fashionable and the painfully unfashionable, people having a great time and people having a terrible time and people who seemed simply overwhelmed by the crowd. For an attraction designed to appeal to anyone and everyone in Kansas City, it seemed like the design was doing its job.

C. says that if you build something, people will inevitably come, especially in Kansas City, a town known more for its past attractions (jazz and barbecue) than its current ones (struggling sports teams and effete community and cultural centers). Clearly, this rule has proven true at P&L, no matter how bland, impersonal, and mercenary the sprawl seemed to me as I leaned out over the crowd from the windy courtyard catwalk.

It's easy to call a place like P&L fake and tacky and exploitative, but it struck me as sad more than anything else. That sadness comes from the fact that it seems unequal to the real people who come out each weekend looking for a good time, looking to meet somebody new, looking to make a memory or to change their lives. In that sense, P&L is no different from any other bar or attraction that doesn't make the magic and excitement it promises. Perhaps it only seemed more poignant to me because of the brightness of its lights, the thousands of faces in its crowd, how far between the city's buildings its blaring music traveled.